Williams v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VEASEY, Chief Justice:
In this appeal we find an implied savings provision in legislation that amended the criminal stalking statute. The result is that a defendant who is charged with committing the crime of stalking under the old statute in effect at the time of the alleged crime may be convicted under the old statute even though the amending legislation that created the new statute did not include an express savings clause. The rationale for this holding is that the new legislation is not a repealer, and it would be an absurd result, clearly not intended by the General Assembly, to hold…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Carmell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Giuricich v. Emtrol Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- Blaustein v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
- Alfieri v. MartelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Humm v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fountain v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
- State v. George Atsidis, etalDelaware Court of Common Pleas · 2018