Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Wiley

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1943No. Civ. 2900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment refusing to annul the marriage of the parties because of alleged fraud of defendant. Defendant was regularly served with summons hut did not appear in the action. The cause was heard as a default matter and defendant has made no appearance here.

The complaint contained the formal allegations usually found in cases of this kind. It was there alleged that prior to and at the time of the marriage ceremony defendant did not intend to have reasonable matrimonial intercourse with the plaintiff; that she concealed this intention from him; that thereafter she refused…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bradley Co. v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Germo Manufacturing Co. v. McClellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Martin v. KehlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Tobola v. WholetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Chemstar, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API