Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Gregory

California Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1901No. S.F. No. 2528PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. J. D. Sullivan, for A. C. Freese, Public Administrator, Appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

A. C. Freese, public administrator of the city and county of San Francisco, filed his petition for letters with the will annexed of Catherine E. Gregory, deceased, praying that it be admitted to probate. In the offered will, Charlotte B. Gregory, adopted daughter of deceased, is named as legatee, and Martha Munson, widow of the late John Munson, as guardian of Charlotte, but no executor was named. It was dated December 10, 1895. Deceased died about August 17, 1898. Robert Ash appeared as contestant, alleging that he is the executor named in the last will of deceased, dated March…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shailer v. BumsteadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  2. Waterman v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Johnson v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Estate of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Estate of RicksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API