Legal Opinion

Cartwright v. Boyce

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1932No. 23515. Department TwoPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

By her guardian ad litem, the plaintiff brought this action to recover for personal injuries resulting from the collision of defendants ’ automobiles, in one of which the plaintiff was riding as a guest. This appeal is from the judgment of nonsuit entered at the close of plaintiff’s case.

Unless there is evidence or reasonable inference therefrom which would have sustained -a verdict in favor of the appellant, the judgment should be affirmed. Jordan v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle R. Co., 109 Wash. 476, 186 Pac. 875.

This is not a case of a collision resulting from the operation of an automobile…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Linden v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Osborne v. CharbneauWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Barret v. Caddo Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  4. Dunsmoor v. North Coast Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Norris v. HadfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cox v. Polson Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Coerver v. HaabWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Tutewiler v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Poland v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Weaver v. WindustWashington Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API