Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Windust

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1938No. 26956. Department OnePublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

In the complaint in this case there are three causes of action separately stated. In the first, the plaintiff Lester Weaver seeks to recover for damages to an automobile. In the second, he states a cause of action for personal injuries. The plaintiffs Clinton Weaver and Margaret Weaver, his wife, in the third cause of action, seek damages for personal injuries to Mrs. Weaver. The cause came on for trial before the court without a jury. At the conclusion of the evidence offered by the plaintiffs, the defendants challenged the legal sufficiency thereof and moved for a dismissal, and from the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Osborne v. CharbneauWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Lambuth v. Stetson & Post, Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Martin v. BearWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Thomas v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Cartwright v. BoyceWashington Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rogge v. WeaverAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Bergstrom v. OveWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc. v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Cook v. RaffertyWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Coerver v. HaabWashington Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API