Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Following the district court’s denial of its motion to vacate a no-fault arbitration award, appellant insurer argues that the arbitrator exceeded his authority when he awarded no-fault benefits for the reasonable value of respondent insured’s household care and maintenance services that were not replaced. Because we conclude that the applicable provision of the no-fault statute supports the award, we affirm.
FACTS
On May 10, 2012, respondent Carmen Sehroeder was rear-ended on Highway 55 after stopping her vehicle to make a left turn. Sehroeder suffered a spinal fracture…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Rindahl v. National Farmers Union Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Karels v. State Farm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Lenz v. Depositors Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015