Legal Opinion

Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 2014No. A13-2289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Following the district court’s denial of its motion to vacate a no-fault arbitration award, appellant insurer argues that the arbitrator exceeded his authority when he awarded no-fault benefits for the reasonable value of respondent insured’s household care and maintenance services that were not replaced. Because we conclude that the applicable provision of the no-fault statute supports the award, we affirm.

FACTS

On May 10, 2012, respondent Carmen Sehroeder was rear-ended on Highway 55 after stopping her vehicle to make a left turn. Sehroeder suffered a spinal fracture…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Nadeau v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Rindahl v. National Farmers Union Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Karels v. State Farm Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Lenz v. Depositors Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API