Legal Opinion
Oteiza v. Braxton
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 20, 1989No. 88-859PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NESBITT, Judge.
This is an appeal from a final summary judgment entered for the defendant attorney in a legal malpractice case. We reverse.
Alberto Oteiza, a physician, employed Harold M. Braxton, an attorney, to represent him in an appeal of a final order of the Board of Medical Examiners, which found Oteiza subject to disciplinary action pursuant to section 458.331(l)(w), Florida Statutes (1983), and which suspended his license to practice medicine for three years. After the appeal was dismissed due to Braxton’s failure to timely file the petition for review, Oteiza commenced the legal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daugert v. PappasWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N v. WebbSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Clark v. Dept. of Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Floyd v. KoskoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Better Homes, Inc. v. RodgersDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Pastor v. Union Central Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- Silvestrone v. EdellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- KJB Village Property, LLC v. Craig M. Dorne, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- TIMOTHY D MURPHY v. JOHN J PANKAUSKIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023