Legal Opinion
Oberdorfer v. Edmund J. Rapport Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 31, 1954PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.
The defendant moves, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order to dismiss the complaint in this action and to direct that judgment be entered in its favor on the ground that the plaintiff’s action has no merit.
The action is for payment of alleged overtime compensation claimed to be due under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 201 et seq.).
At the outset, this court is grateful to the attorneys for both of the parties herein for the illuminating and excellent briefs, which they have presented, with respect to the interesting points of law…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bozant v. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Higgins v. Carr Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ritch v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Murphey v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kornicks v. Lindy's SupermarketMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Hofler v. Spearin, Preston & Burrows, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1966
- Maino v. Urban Meat Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958