Legal Opinion
Ritch v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1946No. 11150PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal, from a judgment denying to appellants recovery from their appellee employers, hereinafter called the dredging contractors, overtime payments under Section 207 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. 207, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207. 1 Appellants contend that their employment is both “in commerce” and in “the production of goods for commerce” as those phrases are used in that Act. The principal facts are stipulated.
The dredging contractors are private contractors engaged in the dredging of two channels in the harbor of. the Bremerton Navy Yard in the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Walling v. Patton-Tulley Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Hodges Contracting Company and Kenneth B. HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Albert S. Craig v. Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation, Far West Engineering Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Albert S. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Empire Gas Engineering CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Walling v. McCrady Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Kam Koon Wan v. E. E. Black, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.