Legal Opinion

Kornicks v. Lindy's Supermarket

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1970No. Docket 7,574PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

Plaintiff Max Kornicks commenced this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, § 1, 52 Stat 1060 (1938), 29 USCA § 201, to recover additional compensation from defendant Lindy’s Supermarket for overtime work performed during a three-year period from 1962 to 1965. Following the close of plaintiff’s proofs, defendant moved for a directed verdict. The motion was granted and defendant appeals.

The act provides minimum wages for employees “engaged in commerce” 1 and for employees employed in an “enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.” 2 The terms “commerce,”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Jackson v. Airways Parking CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
  3. Bonner v. AmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Oscar MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Marderosian v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Villa v. GolichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Marderosian v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. People v. Oscar MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API