Kornicks v. Lindy's Supermarket
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.
Plaintiff Max Kornicks commenced this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act, § 1, 52 Stat 1060 (1938), 29 USCA § 201, to recover additional compensation from defendant Lindy’s Supermarket for overtime work performed during a three-year period from 1962 to 1965. Following the close of plaintiff’s proofs, defendant moved for a directed verdict. The motion was granted and defendant appeals.
The act provides minimum wages for employees “engaged in commerce” 1 and for employees employed in an “enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.” 2 The terms “commerce,”…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Jackson v. Airways Parking CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
- Bonner v. AmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
- Knoper v. BurtonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Oscar MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Marderosian v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Villa v. GolichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Marderosian v. Stroh Brewery Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. Oscar MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987