Ledford v. Huggans
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This action was commenced by-plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $2,305, and for foreclosure of a real estate mortgage. The defendants answered that the note and mortgage were executed, but were not in truth and in fact unconditional contracts to pay money, but were executed for the purpose of indemnifying the plaintiff against the payment of a certain mortgage to Maxwell & Maxwell, and binding them to pay the mortgage to Maxwell & Maxwell at its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anicker v. DoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Horton v. BirdsongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Fernandez v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Oaks v. ScheifferlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Barnett v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nickel v. JandaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. FrancisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Thompson v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Hollis v. O. A. Steiner Tire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Mayes v. Farmers' BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924