Legal Opinion

Sagendorph v. Lutz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1938No. Docket No. 26, Calendar No. 39,916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiffs seek by this bill in chancery to quiet their title to a parcel of land in the city of Jackson as against an inchoate right of dower asserted by defendant Margaret Lntz. The other defendants have no interest in the outcome of this suit. The circuit judge decreed that Margaret Lutz, hereinafter called defendant, does not possess a dower right, and she has appealed.

The following facts are pertinent to an understanding of the basis upon which defendant asserts a dower interest. Margaret Lntz is the wife of Martin I. Lntz. During the period covered by this litigation they resided in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Young v. McKeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Willing v. PetersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
  3. Mallory v. RussellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  4. Hunter v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Hugunin v. CochraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strong v. Page (In Re Page)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1999
  2. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Freier v. LongneckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  4. Redman v. ShawMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Rossman v. MarshMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API