Legal Opinion

Young v. McKee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1865PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal in Chancery from St. Clair Circuit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley J. :

The complainant filed his hill to foreclose a mortgage given hy the defendant Catharine McKee to Maleom Cameron, for the difference between certain lands exchanged by said Cameron with Frederick McKee, the other defendant. McKee, instead of taking a conveyance of the Cameron lands to himself, caused them to be deeded to said Catharine, who is his wife; and she united with him in notes for the difference agreed to be paid to Cameron, and the mortgage in controversy was given to secure these notes. In the bill, complainant avers that the mortgage and notes were assigned by Cameron to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. KinneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1830
  2. Dougherty v. RandallMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Morris v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Morris v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Richardson v. BorightSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. v. DykesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Lenfesty v. CoeSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  3. Mickle v. MaxfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Sallie v. Fifth Third BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Simmons v. SternCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API