Legal Opinion

Hugunin v. Cochrane

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Wbit of Eeeoe to the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. John A. Jameson, Judge, presiding. The facts in this case are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

It appears, from the record in this case, that John C. Hugunin and Alexander Logan, on the 3d day of April, 1837, purchased of Leonard C. Hugunin, the undivided half of lot five, in School Section addition to Chicago. The consideration expressed in the deed was $2,000, for which promissory notes were given by the grantees, and accepted by the grantor. Afterwards, on the 20th day of Hay, 1837, the same premises were re-conveyed by John C. Hugunin and Alexander Logan to Leonard O. Hugunin, and he returned their notes to them. Plaintiff in error did not join in the deed re-conveying the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Warner v. Van AlstyneNew York Court of Chancery · 1831

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Sagendorph v. LutzMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Henze v. MitchellNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Melton Et Ux. v. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API