Legal Opinion

Rossman v. Marsh

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1939No. Docket No. 61, Calendar No. 40,081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* See opinions on rehearing, post, 720. — REPORTER. Plaintiff Rossman, receiver of the Union Peoples National Bank, of Jackson, Michigan, filed a bill of complaint seeking a determination of the amount which he claimed the defendants owed the bank on a promissory note and indenture of mortgage. In the event of default in payment he sought foreclosure and sale with a deficiency judgment, if necessary. The original mortgagee was the National Union Bank of Jackson, whose name was changed to National Union Bank Trust Company, which in turn consolidated with Peoples National Bank in order to form…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frost v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Goldwater v. OltmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Hemphill v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Michigan Trust Co. v. HerpolsheimerMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Nedeau v. United PetroleumMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rossman v. MarshMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Rossman v. MarshMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API