Legal Opinion

Mas Corp. v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1983No. 8218SC344PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Appellants’ first four arguments are that the trial court erred in denying their motions for summary judgment and directed verdict, and in granting defendant’s motion for directed verdict on two of appellants’ claims. The purpose of summary judgment is to bring litigation to an early decision on the merits without the delay and expense of trial when no material facts are at issue. McNair v. Boyette, 282 N.C. 230, 192 S.E. 2d 457 (1972). That purpose cannot be served after there has been a trial. Denial of a motion for summary judgment, therefore, should not be reviewable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. BurnetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Adder v. Holman & Moody, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Harris v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Morgan v. American UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Marina Food Associates, Inc. v. Marina Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API