Legal Opinion

Harris v. Walden

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 13, 1985No. 641PA84PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The first question presented by this appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in entering parital summary judgment for plaintiff. Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment was denied by Judge Grist, and the case proceeded to trial where judgment was entered for the defendants. We find that the Court of Appeals erroneously entered partial summary judgment for the plaintiff, and we therefore reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Secondly, after reviewing the findings of fact to which plaintiff excepted, we find the trial judge’s conclusion that defendants acquired title…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNair v. BoyetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Home Indemnity Co. v. Reynolds & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Pollock v. Reeves Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Sessler v. MarshCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. TillettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Concrete Service Corp. v. Investors Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API