Legal Opinion

Weihbrecht v. Linzmeyer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

Extension of Time on Motions After Verdict.

The trial court ordered a new trial unless the plaintiff exercised the option to accept damages reduced from the jury’s award of $42,415.77 to $12,443.02. The order of the trial court was made on April 11, 1963, which was over sixty days after the verdict was rendered. The first question to be resolved on this appeal is whether the trial court retained the right to rule on a motion to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial. Sec. 270.49 (1), Stats., provides in part that such a motion “must be made and heard within sixty days after the verdict is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyle v. LarzelereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Harweger v. WilcoxWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Briggson v. City of ViroquaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McLaughlin v. CHICAGO, M., ST. P. & PR CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Purchal v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  4. State ex rel. M. v. CatalanoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Purchal v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API