State ex rel. M. v. Catalano
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in a paternity action. The plaintiff-appellant, Ms. M. (hereinafter plaintiff) alleged that the defendant-respondent, Robert Catalano (hereinafter defendant) was the father of her child. The jury returned a verdict that the defendant was the father. The defendant moved for a new trial and the trial judge granted the motion. The plaintiff appealed from the court’s order granting the new trial.
The issues in this case are as follows:
1. Was the order granting the new trial jurisdiction-ally valid under sec. 270.49 (1), Stats. (1973) ?
2. Should…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boyle v. LarzelereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- Paulsen v. GundersenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- Dupler v. SeubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Lingelbach v. CarriveauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Bankers Finance Corp. v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Lutchin v. Outagamie County CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969