Legal Opinion

State ex rel. M. v. Catalano

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1978No. 75-411PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in a paternity action. The plaintiff-appellant, Ms. M. (hereinafter plaintiff) alleged that the defendant-respondent, Robert Catalano (hereinafter defendant) was the father of her child. The jury returned a verdict that the defendant was the father. The defendant moved for a new trial and the trial judge granted the motion. The plaintiff appealed from the court’s order granting the new trial.

The issues in this case are as follows:

1. Was the order granting the new trial jurisdiction-ally valid under sec. 270.49 (1), Stats. (1973) ?

2. Should…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyle v. LarzelereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Paulsen v. GundersenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Dupler v. SeubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Lingelbach v. CarriveauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bankers Finance Corp. v. ChristensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Lutchin v. Outagamie County CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API