Legal Opinion

Briggson v. City of Viroqua

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The appeal and cross appeal before the court raise only procedural questions relating to extension of time for serving the bill of exceptions.

As in the recent case of Valentine v. Patrick Warren Construction Co. (1953), 263 Wis. 143, 56 N. W. (2d) 860, the order of September 24, 1952, extending time to settle the bill of exceptions, was made after, the ninety-day period provided by statute for the settlement of the bill of exceptions had expired. Therefore, under the provisions of sec. 269.45, Stats., it was necessary for counsel of the defendant city (who intended to appeal from the judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Chaloner v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Valentine v. Patrick Warren Construction Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Boyle v. LarzelereWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. Hall v. CowieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Schulter v. RoraffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Miller v. BelangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Highway 100 Auto Wreckers, Inc. v. City of West AllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Weihbrecht v. LinzmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API