Legal Opinion

KELLY-STEHNEY & ASSOCIATES, INC v. MacDONALD’S INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2003No. Docket 238079PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZahra, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition. We affirm.

I. factual and procedural history

On February 23, 1994, the parties entered into a Manufacturer’s Representative Agreement (mra), which provided that plaintiff would work for defendant as an independent contractor selling products manufactured by defendant to other manufacturers in the automotive industry. The mra provided that plaintiff would receive three percent commissions on new product sales of defendant’s products unless otherwise agreed in writing. The mra bound…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Quinto v. Cross and Peters Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. McIntireMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Veenstra v. Washtenaw Country ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Novak v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Peña v. Ingham County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. CatheyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Nippa v. Botsford General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. KELLY-STEHNEY & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. MacDonald's Industrial Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Kelly-Stehney & Associates, Inc. v. MACDONALD'S INDUS. PRODUCTS, INC.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API