Legal Opinion
Armendariz v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided December 10, 2003No. 0070-02PublishedCited by 738 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HolcombHolcomb, J.
in which KELLER, P. J., and PRICE, WOMACK, KEASLER, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
The court of appeals held that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion to suppress. Armendariz v. State, 63 S.W.3d 572, 578 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2001). We reverse.
The Relevant Facts
An Ector County grand jury indicted appellant on one count of possession of a controlled substance, namely cocaine. See Tex. Health & Safety Code § 481.115(d). Appellant later filed a motion to suppress the cocaine in question, and the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on the motion. The evidence adduced at…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by738 opinions
- St. George v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State v. IduarteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Hudson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
- Vasquez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
733 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.