Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 16, 1982No. SPCM 16453PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MILLER, Judge:

An initial issue in this case is the admissibility of hearsay statements made by a mother to her injured son’s attending physician. A similar issue involves the admissibility of an extract of appellant’s medical records reflecting various conversations between a social worker, the appellant, his injured son, and the appellant’s wife.

*884The appellant was tried in absentia and convicted of assaulting his four-year old son Rondell by striking him in the face and dropping him to the floor, thereby intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm.1 He was sentenced to a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Eneas Lavern NickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. NarcisoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
  4. United States v. William M. RuffinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. James Felix Knife, United States of America v. Leroy Lavern IyotteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. DelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. UrbinaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. FinkU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. LemereUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  5. United States v. MorenoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API