United States v. Moreno
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
De GIULIO, Judge:
Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial composed of officer members found appellant guilty of one specification of sodomy and one specification of indecent acts. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for one year. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence.
Appellant alleges, inter alia, that the military judge erred by admitting appellant’s confession because it violated Article 31, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 831, and MiLR.Evid. 305(d)(1)(B) and that the military judge *524erred by admitting…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. HinesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- Paez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- United States v. PennUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. LonetreeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. MorenoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. CarterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992