Legal Opinion
United States v. Chasteen
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
Decided November 16, 1983No. ACM 23946PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
HODGSON, Chief Judge:
The accused, while stationed in Korea, was a central figure in an extensive black marketing operation. He was also an active participant in a “marriage for hire” scheme in which American servicemen would marry Korean women who in turn would agree to a divorce after they entered the United States. The conduct described above resulted in the accused’s conviction, following mixed pleas, of conspiring to engage in black marketing activities, black marketing, soliciting another to violate United States immigration laws, receiving stolen property, and obstructing the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. HubbardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- United States v. WimberlyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. Charles D. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. BridgesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
- United States v. HopkinsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. RehakU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. ChasteenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.