Legal Opinion

United States v. Hopkins

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 20, 1987No. ACM S27585PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MURDOCK, Judge:

This case presents an unusual question about presentencing instructions. The appellant was found guilty of marijuana use pursuant to his pleas of guilty. During the Article 39(a), U.C.M.J., session on presentencing instructions the defense counsel submitted a proposed instruction on the effect of a bad conduct discharge. We hold that the military judge was within his discretion in declining to give the requested instruction.

For several years Air Force military judges have been encouraged to use the instructions found in the Military Judges’ Benchbook, Department of Army…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. ChasteenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  3. United States v. SimpsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. StatonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
  3. United States v. LenardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. NewlanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API