United States v. Hopkins
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MURDOCK, Judge:
This case presents an unusual question about presentencing instructions. The appellant was found guilty of marijuana use pursuant to his pleas of guilty. During the Article 39(a), U.C.M.J., session on presentencing instructions the defense counsel submitted a proposed instruction on the effect of a bad conduct discharge. We hold that the military judge was within his discretion in declining to give the requested instruction.
For several years Air Force military judges have been encouraged to use the instructions found in the Military Judges’ Benchbook, Department of Army…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. ChasteenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
- United States v. SimpsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HarrisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. StatonUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- United States v. LenardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. NewlanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016