Legal Opinion

United States v. Rehak

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 20, 1988No. ACMR 8701382PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Senior Judge:

Appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of larceny, soliciting another to commit an offense and obstruction of justice. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three years, forfeiture of $450.00 pay per month for thirty-six months, and reduction to Private E-l. The convening authority approved the sentence.

Appellant alleges that the obstruction of justice specification should be dismissed for failure to state an offense because it involves…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles D. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  3. United States v. ChodkowskiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. Joe D. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. ChasteenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. BaileyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. LatimerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. DowlatU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API