Legal Opinion

Erwin v. Bryan

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 2010No. 2009-0580Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Erwin v. Bryan, 125 Ohio St.3d 519,

2010-Ohio-2202.] ERWIN, ADMR., APPELLEE, v. BRYAN ET AL.; SWOGER ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Erwin v. Bryan, 125 Ohio St.3d 519,

2010-Ohio-2202.] Civ.R. 15 — Name of party unknown — Pursuant to Civ.R. 15(D), a complaint against a party whose name is unknown must describe the defendant and a summons containing the words “name unknown” must be personally served on the defendant — Civ.R. 15(D) does not authorize a claimant to designate defendants using fictitious names as placeholders in a complaint filed within the statute-of-limitations period and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Flowers v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Fletcher v. University HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Cundall v. U.S. BankOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Proctor v. KardassilarisOhio Supreme Court · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API