Legal Opinion

Bell v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 6, 1996No. 95-CF-57PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute it, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(1) (1993). His principal argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in admitting what he regards as “other crimes” evidence, namely, evidence that he had engaged in several apparent drug sales shortly before he was arrested. We affirm.

*1046I

On a summer afternoon in broad daylight, while appellant stood on the sidewalk in front of a methadone clinic on New Jersey Avenue, S.E., several other persons gathered around him. One by one, they gave him money in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. McGriff v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Long v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Scott v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API