Legal Opinion

McGriff v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 18, 1997No. 94-CF-1552, 94-CF-1622PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellants McGriff and Harris were each convicted of carrying a pistol without a license, 1 possession of an unregistered firearm, 2 and unlawful possession of ammunition. 3 On appeal, McGriff contends that the trial court erred in (1) denying him an opportunity to cross-examine a police officer about a threat which the officer had allegedly made against McGriff and his counsel; (2) admitting evidence of traffic violations which led to the arrest of both appellants and were thus relevant to the charged offenses; (3) failing to impose more severe sanctions than it did…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Clayborne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Crutchfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API