McGriff v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Appellants McGriff and Harris were each convicted of carrying a pistol without a license, 1 possession of an unregistered firearm, 2 and unlawful possession of ammunition. 3 On appeal, McGriff contends that the trial court erred in (1) denying him an opportunity to cross-examine a police officer about a threat which the officer had allegedly made against McGriff and his counsel; (2) admitting evidence of traffic violations which led to the arrest of both appellants and were thus relevant to the charged offenses; (3) failing to impose more severe sanctions than it did…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Springer v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Clayborne v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Crutchfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.