Legal Opinion

State v. Avery

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 16, 1980No. 806SC264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant first contends that it was error for the trial court to deny the motions for nonsuit or dismissal. We do not agree. There was sufficient evidence to take the case to the jury.

On a motion for nonsuit or dismissal, the court must determine whether there is substantial evidence of all the material elements of the offense charged. State v. Stephens, 244 N.C. 380, 93 S.E. 2d 431 (1956); State v. Smith 40 N.C. App. 72, 252 S.E. 2d 535 (1979). In other words, there must be sufficient evidence to support a finding that the crime charged was committed and that the defendant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. QuilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. EasterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API