Legal Opinion

State v. Easter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1981No. 8026SC804PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

At the outset, we must cite defendant’s counsel for several violations of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. The record on appeal is not organized properly. The judgment and order of commitment, as well as the appeal entries, immediately follow the indictments and precede the summary of the trial proceedings. Each item in the record should be arranged chronologically, in the same order in which it occurred at trial. App. R. 9(b)(4). In addition, counsel reproduced the entire charge to the jury, which covers fifteen typed pages, but he brought forward no assignment of error to a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. EasterlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. BrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API