State v. McRae
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant brings forward several assignments of error. None of them disclose prejudicial error.
Defendant first argues that the court committed prejudicial error in denying his motion to quash the State’s subpoena for the two children who were in the automobile at the time of the alleged kidnapping. Defendant’s motion, in effect, asked the court to declare the children incompetent witnesses before they had even been called to testify. In North Carolina, however, there is no age below which one is considered incompetent, as a matter of law, to testify. State v. Thomas, 296 N.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. RieraSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. BarbourSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014