Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1981No. 8113SC507PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant first contends it was error for the trial court to deny his motions for nonsuit and dismissal of the charge of second degree murder. We do not agree.

On a motion for nonsuit, the court must determine whether there is substantial evidence of each material element of the offense charged. Evidence is to be considered in the light most favorable to the State. State v. Avery, 48 N.C. App. 675, 269 S.E. 2d 708 (1980). We conclude that in the present cause there was sufficient evidence for the court to charge the jury on second degree murder.

Murder in the second degree is the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. WrennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. EveretteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. RudolphCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ScercyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API