Legal Opinion

State v. Cochran

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 5, 2006No. C020380CR; A120834PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court. State v. Cochran, 339 Or 609, 127 P3d 650 (2005). Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992(4)(b). Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. We initially affirmed defendant’s convictions, but now reconsider defendant’s appeal in light of State v. Hall, 339 Or 7, 115 P3d 908 (2005), and reverse and remand.

We begin with the facts. In reviewing a denial of a motion to suppress, we are bound by the trial court’s findings of historical facts as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. State v. MastinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. CochranOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HighleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API