Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sladisky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 2012No. 67 C.D. 2011Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION by

Senior Judge FRIEDMAN.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to affirm the order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) denying Michael Sladisky’s (Claimant) reinstatement petition. I do not agree that Claimant, following the expiration of the 500-week period of partial disability benefits exhausted during funded light-duty employment, must prove his physical condition has worsened in order to have his total disability benefits reinstated.

For purposes of workers’ compensation, “disability is the loss of earning power attributable to the work-related…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dillon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Diehl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Stanek v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Riddle v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API