Legal Opinion

Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 2000PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a workers’ compensation claimant who has not fully recovered from a work-related injury is entitled to reinstatement of total disability benefits when laid off from a modified duty job by the time-of-injury employer.

On September 7, 1992, George Laubach sustained a lumbosacral strain while working for Bethlehem Steel Corporation. Laubach received workers’ compensation benefits pursuant to a notice of compensation payable. He was not released to *316return to his pre-injury job, but was able…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Stevens v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Bufford v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Day v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. North Pittsburgh Drywall Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API