Legal Opinion

In re Andres

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 6, 2004No. 02-428PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Respondent, Robert Andres, Esq., appeals a Professional Responsibility Board decision that he violated Rule 1.3 of the Vermont Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to attend a pretrial hearing and to respond to a motion for summary judgment. We adopt the Professional Responsibility Board’s ruling and suspend respondent for a period of two months.

¶ 2. Respondent was assigned to represent Andres Torres in a post-conviction relief (PCR) petition arising out of Torres’s 1997 guilty plea to a second offense of domestic assault. Torres was represented by counsel other than respondent when…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. In Re TorresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  3. In Re BlaisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
  4. In Re WarrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. In Re GadboisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  2. In re HongistoSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. In re Richard Bowen, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  4. In re PRB Docket No. 2012.155Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  5. In Re C. Robert Manby, Jr., Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API