Legal Opinion

In re PRB Docket No. 2012.155

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 3, 2015No. 14-082PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

2Per curiam

Office of Disciplinary Counsel appeals the determination of the Hearing Panel of the Professional Responsibility Board that attorney should receive a private admonition sanction for violating Vermont Rule of Professional Conduct 1.15 by commingling personal and client funds in his client trust account. We affirm.

¶ 2. The parties stipulated to the following facts. Attorney was admitted to the Vermont bar in 1983. He worked as a solo practitioner and independent contractor until 1986, at which time he signed on as an associate with another law firm. In 1997, he again established his own…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re FarrarSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. In Re NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. In re Melvin FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  4. In re AndresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re PRB Docket No. 2012-155Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. In re PRB No. 2013-145Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  3. In re PRB Docket No. 2016-042Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  4. In re PRB No. 2018-087Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API