In re PRB Docket No. 2012.155
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
2Per curiam
Office of Disciplinary Counsel appeals the determination of the Hearing Panel of the Professional Responsibility Board that attorney should receive a private admonition sanction for violating Vermont Rule of Professional Conduct 1.15 by commingling personal and client funds in his client trust account. We affirm.
¶ 2. The parties stipulated to the following facts. Attorney was admitted to the Vermont bar in 1983. He worked as a solo practitioner and independent contractor until 1986, at which time he signed on as an associate with another law firm. In 1997, he again established his own…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re FarrarSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In re Melvin FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- In re AndresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re PRB Docket No. 2012-155Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re PRB No. 2013-145Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In re PRB Docket No. 2016-042Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re PRB No. 2018-087Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019