Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Neisner

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 29, 2010No. 2009-378PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

¶ 1. Respondent attorney Melvin B. Neisner, Jr. appeals from the recommended sanction of the Vermont Professional Responsibility Board Hearing Panel. Respondent was convicted of criminal offenses, including giving false information to a law enforcement authority and impeding a public officer, stemming from leaving the scene of a car accident and then falsely reporting that his wife had caused the accident. The Panel found that respondent had violated Vermont Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(b), and it imposed both a suspension from the practice of law for a period of one year commencing on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. State v. NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  3. In Re BoardmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. In Re WarrenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  5. In re AndresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kirk Wool v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  2. William S. Lockett, Jr. v. Board of Professional ResponsibilityTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. NeisnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. In re Melvin FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  5. In re Strouse, Esq.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API