State Ex Rel. Cline v. Schricker
Indiana Supreme Court
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION The allegations of the complaint are substantially as set forth in the majority opinion, though they are much more direct and specific than in the opinion. They are fully sufficient to state a good cause of action showing a fraudulent violation of the Constitution of the State of Indiana by the members of the Eighty-sixth General Assembly. This violation the opinion in substance admits but seeks to excuse or avoid.
The complaint states a class action for injunction on behalf of relator and all citizens of Indiana similarly situated.
I think the record presents procedural…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Needham v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Home InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe Co. v. Lafayette, Muncie, & Bloomington RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- State v. ComerIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.