Legal Opinion
Jones v. Central Builders Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 8, 1961No. 21274PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Justice.
A general demurrer asserting that a petition seeking both recovery of damages and equitable relief sets forth no cause of action requires a decision only as to whether the plaintiff, under the allegations of the petition, is entitled to the recovery sought or the relief prayed. Copeland v. Cheney, 116 Ga. 685, 687 (43 SE 59).
The petition seeks to obtain a decree that the promissory note and security deed given by the plaintiff to the defendant be reformed so as to delete from those instruments the clause providing that the date of their maturity was 120 days after the date…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stonecypher v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Hadden v. Southern Messenger ServiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Copeland v. CheneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Cottle v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Deck v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Turpin v. North American Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Rochester Capital Leasing Corp. v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Southern Discount Co. v. KirklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- First National Bank v. OsborneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.