Legal Opinion

Gursten v. Kenney

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1965No. Calendar 69, Docket 50,692PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint on the ground of res judicata.

Plaintiff, an attorney, complained against the defendants, a firm of attorneys, alleging they forced him to stipulate to an order in the nature of a consent judgment.

A client and business associate of plaintiff became bankrupt. The client’s trustee in bankruptcy, represented by defendants, proceeded against plaintiff to recover assets of the client that had been acquired by plaintiff. A compromise of the dispute was reached. On February 15,1963, the referee in bankruptcy…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harrington v. Huff & Mitchell Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Shank v. CastleMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Meister v. DillonMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. FurbeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Paige v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Sonsearaharay POLK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., an Indiana Corporation, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. Socialist Workers Party v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Hackley v. HackleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API