Legal Opinion

State v. Schlosser

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1997No. Nos. 96-1389 and 96-1390PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

The issue in this appeal involves the mental state required for a conviction under Ohio’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) statute. In particular, the issue certified to this court by the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County is, “Is any culpable mental state required for a violation of R.C. 2923.32(A)(1) and, if so, what culpable mental state is required?” We hold that Ohio’s RICO statute, R.C. 2923.32(A)(1), plainly indicates a purpose to impose strict liability.

Formerly, legislative silence as to mens rea in a statute defining an offense was interpreted as an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. Anthony M. Scotto and Anthony AnastasioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. PalmeriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. Dent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. MirandaOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Beverly (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Foster v. D.B.S. Collection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API