Legal Opinion

Foster v. D.B.S. Collection Agency

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided December 5, 2006No. 1:01-cv-00514PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; (2) Defendant Ward D. Coff-man Ill’s (“Coffman”), Motion for Summary Judgment; and (3) Defendant Kathy Dickerson’s/D.B.S. Collection Agency’s (“Dickerson”) Motion for Summary Judgment. 1

In this ease, Plaintiffs seek to recover based on (1) the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”); (2) the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act, Ohio Revised Code § 1345.01 et seq. (“OCSPA”); (3) common law fraud; (4) the Ohio Pattern of…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Barany-Snyder v. WeinerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Whittiker v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  4. Robins v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API