Legal Opinion

Morris v. Morris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1979No. 781DC1053PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

After a hearing on the motion to dismiss, the trial court concluded:

[T]he Court is of the opinion that it does have jurisdiction to conduct a hearing upon said Order to Show Cause, the plaintiff having invoked the jurisdiction of this Court originally and having been a party to the Consent Judgment entered by this Court on the 1st day of April, 1975, wherein custody, support and visitation rights of the children with the defendant were determined by the Court, the Court further being of the opinion that the jurisdiction of this Court is a continuing jurisdiction with reference…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beall v. BeallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Kinross-Wright v. Kinross-WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Romano v. RomanoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Sturdivant v. SturdivantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Latham v. LathamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Beck v. BeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Misero v. MiseroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API