Romano v. Romano
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
Both parties to this action were before the court for all purposes involved in the divorce proceeding. The plaintiff, a resident of this State, instituted the action against the defendant, a resident of Pennsylvania. The defendant appeared before the court in person by attorney and by filing an answer and cross action for alimony, counsel fees, and the custody of the child. The defendant admitted she had the custody of the infant in Pennsylvania; and that he had never been in the State of North Carolina.
By this appeal the plaintiff challenges the order of the Superior Court only insofar as it…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richter v. HarmonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Gafford v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Weddington v. WeddingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Coble v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Speck v. SpeckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979