Legal Opinion

Kinross-Wright v. Kinross-Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1958No. 668PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Winborne, C. J.:

In the light of the facts found as hereinabove set forth, appellant, defendant, states in brief filed herein, as involved on this appeal, several questions, among which are:

1. “Was it within the court’s jurisdiction and discretion to entertain chis litigation?” The answer is “Yes”. See Barber v. Barber, 216 N.C. 232, 4 S.E. 2d 447; Finance Co. v. Trust Co., 213 N.C. 369, 196 S.E. 340; Land Bank v. Davis, 215 N.C. 100, 1 S.E. 2d 350; Barber v. Barber, 217 N.C. 422, 8 S.E. 2d 204.

In the first Barber case, supra, this Court said: “An action in court is not ended by the rendition…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. Abernethy Land & Finance Co. v. First Security Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Rayfield v. RayfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. In re L.O.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Elmore v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. In Re the Custody of OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Sears v. SearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API