Kinross-Wright v. Kinross-Wright
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Winborne, C. J.:
In the light of the facts found as hereinabove set forth, appellant, defendant, states in brief filed herein, as involved on this appeal, several questions, among which are:
1. “Was it within the court’s jurisdiction and discretion to entertain chis litigation?” The answer is “Yes”. See Barber v. Barber, 216 N.C. 232, 4 S.E. 2d 447; Finance Co. v. Trust Co., 213 N.C. 369, 196 S.E. 340; Land Bank v. Davis, 215 N.C. 100, 1 S.E. 2d 350; Barber v. Barber, 217 N.C. 422, 8 S.E. 2d 204.
In the first Barber case, supra, this Court said: “An action in court is not ended by the rendition…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Michigan Trust Co. v. FerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Yow v. YowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Abernethy Land & Finance Co. v. First Security Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Rayfield v. RayfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- In re L.O.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Elmore v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- In Re the Custody of OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Sears v. SearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.