Tamara A. v. Montgomery County Dept. of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*183ALAN M. WILNER, Judge
(Retired, Specially Assigned).
Maryland Code, § 10-222(a) of the State Government Article (SG), which is part of the State Administrative Procedure Act, provides, generally, that a party aggrieved by the final decision of a covered agency in a contested case is entitled to judicial review. Section 10-222(b) contains an exception to the “final decision” requirement. It permits immediate judicial review of an interlocutory order in certain enumerated circumstances. The issue before us is whether an interlocutory order by an administrative law judge (ALJ) that denied a motion…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Will v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Shoemaker v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cosby v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Rich v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- RENAISSANCE CENTRO COLUMBIA, LLC. v. BroidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Rios v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Coley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.