Shoemaker v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
The immediate issue before us is a procedural one—whether the Court of Special Appeals erred in dismissing petitioners’ appeal from an interlocutory order denying their motion for summary judgment, upon a finding that the appeal did not fall within the collateral order doctrine. The motion for summary judgment was based on a claim of immunity under the Maryland Tort Claims Act (Maryland Code, § 12-105 of the State Government Article and § 5-522 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article), and, to resolve the procedural issue, we need to determine the standard of “malice” for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Young v. City of Mount RanierCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- E.W. v. Rosemary DolgosCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Barbre v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- DiPino v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Okwa v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.